Web Applications 1.0 + XHTML 2.0 combination

by **PMB9** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:48 pm

I think Web Applications 1.0 is for the application-part of a website useful and XHTML is for the text useful. A Combination would be great. I think everybody does not want two standards for one thing. I want no HTML 5. I want Web Applications 1.0 with this great new features in your paper.

This is my suggestion:

Code: Select all: <webapp xmlns="urn:whatwg:webapplication:1.0" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/"> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <footer> <xhtml:p>This is the Footer!</p> </footer> </body> </webapp>

by **zcorpan** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:34 pm

PMB9 wrote:I think Web Applications 1.0 is for the application-part of a website useful and XHTML is for the text useful. A Combination would be great.

HTML5 covers both the application part and the document part.

PMB9 wrote:I think everybody does not want two standards for one thing.

Right.

PMB9 wrote:I want no HTML 5.

Because...?

PMB9 wrote:I want Web Applications 1.0 with this great new features in your paper.

This is my suggestion:
Code: Select all
<webapp xmlns="urn:whatwg:webapplication:1.0" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/"> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <footer> <xhtml:p>This is the Footer!</p> </footer> </body> </webapp>

What's wrong with:

Code: Select all: <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <footer> <p>This is the Footer!</p> </footer> </body> </html>

...?

by **PMB9** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:50 pm

zcorpan wrote:What's wrong with:
Code: Select all
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <footer> <p>This is the Footer!</p> </footer> </body> </html>
...?

This is not valid XHTML. ;-)

Reason: footer is no element in the namespace
The good markup language should be usable for documents (ODF) and Webpages. The Footer-elemet could be useful for documents, if the meaning is the document footer.

by **zcorpan** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:53 pm

PMB9 wrote:This is not valid XHTML.

It's valid XHTML5.

PMB9 wrote:The good markup language should be usable for documents (ODF) and Webpages. The Footer-elemet could be useful for documents, if the meaning is the document footer.

I don't follow.

by **PMB9** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:11 pm

compare:

Code: Select all: <office:document-content xmlns:office="urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:office:1.0" xmlns:text="urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:text:1.0">

and

Code: Select all: <app:webapp xmlns:app="urn:whatwg:webapplication:1.0" xmlns:text="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/">

by **anne** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:37 am

compare with:

Code: Select all: <html>

Web Applications 1.0 + XHTML 2.0 combination

Web Applications 1.0 + XHTML 2.0 combination

Re: Web Applications 1.0 + XHTML 2.0 combination

Re: Web Applications 1.0 + XHTML 2.0 combination

Re: Web Applications 1.0 + XHTML 2.0 combination

Who is online

Who is online