This is my suggestion:
- Code: Select all
<webapp xmlns="urn:whatwg:webapplication:1.0" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/">
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<footer>
<xhtml:p>This is the Footer!</p>
</footer>
</body>
</webapp>
It is currently Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:17 pm Advanced search
<webapp xmlns="urn:whatwg:webapplication:1.0" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/">
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<footer>
<xhtml:p>This is the Footer!</p>
</footer>
</body>
</webapp>
HTML5 covers both the application part and the document part.PMB9 wrote:I think Web Applications 1.0 is for the application-part of a website useful and XHTML is for the text useful. A Combination would be great.
Right.PMB9 wrote:I think everybody does not want two standards for one thing.
Because...?PMB9 wrote:I want no HTML 5.
What's wrong with:PMB9 wrote:I want Web Applications 1.0 with this great new features in your paper.
This is my suggestion:
- Code: Select all
<webapp xmlns="urn:whatwg:webapplication:1.0" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/">
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<footer>
<xhtml:p>This is the Footer!</p>
</footer>
</body>
</webapp>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<footer>
<p>This is the Footer!</p>
</footer>
</body>
</html>
zcorpan wrote:What's wrong with:...?
- Code: Select all
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<footer>
<p>This is the Footer!</p>
</footer>
</body>
</html>
It's valid XHTML5.PMB9 wrote:This is not valid XHTML.
I don't follow.PMB9 wrote:The good markup language should be usable for documents (ODF) and Webpages. The Footer-elemet could be useful for documents, if the meaning is the document footer.
<office:document-content
xmlns:office="urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:office:1.0"
xmlns:text="urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:text:1.0">
<app:webapp
xmlns:app="urn:whatwg:webapplication:1.0"
xmlns:text="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/">
<html>
Return to Feedback on the Specs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests